Wednesday, 22 June 2016 10:05

Let’s be clear on what Dairy Australia can do for us

Written by  Karrinjeet Singh-Mahil
The Legendairy campaign is just one of the Dairy Australia programs. The Legendairy campaign is just one of the Dairy Australia programs.

OPINION:

DAIRY AUSTRALIA is levy-payer funded service organisation for the dairy industry.

Why do I start with this definition?

Because I am tired of seeing the words representative body and Dairy Australia in the same document, let alone the same paragraph or same sentence.

Our industry representative bodies are Australian Dairyfarmers (ADF) and state bodies such as the United Dairyfarmers’of Victoria (UDV) or South Australian Dairyfarmers’ Organisation (SADA).

We hear much criticism about Dairy Australia from farmers and non-farmers who do not understand these definitions.

I was always taught that in order to criticise something, you must first understand it.

Seems logical.

So what does Dairy Australia do?

Basically, Dairy Australia funds research and dairy extension for our industry.

It does some other bits and pieces alongside these key activities, including some limited industry promotion.

At the moment, a key program Dairy Australia rolling out through its regional development programs, is a suite of resources to assist in making good on-farm decisions, called Tactics for Tight Times.

A key element of the Tactics for Tight Times program is Taking Stock.

I speak from personal experience in saying that Taking Stock is an excellent opportunity for one-on-one assessment of how things are going on your farm.

And it’s free.To every dairy levy-payer.

What does Taking Stock do for you?

It helps you work out whether you need to make different decisions about stocking rates, feeding regimes, staffing levels, farm infrastructure and every other aspect of your farming practice.

Dairy Australia’s farm management tool, Dairy Base, is a key part of the assessment as it benchmarks what you’re doing on your farm with what others are doing on their farms.

As farmers, we are running businesses.

Very few of us do what we do as a hobby. We have to make our businesses pay.

And like any other business, we have a range of legal requirements we must meet, as well as a range of social licence issues to keep in mind.

If we choose to, we can take up any number of learning opportunities provided for us by Dairy Australia to run our businesses more profitably.
It’s up to us.

One of the criticisms we hear about Dairy Australia is that it is a puppet of Group B members, or milk processors.

Let’s clear something up straight away.

There are only two Group B members of Dairy Australia; ADF and the Australian Dairy Products Federation (ADPF).

Why must Dairy Australia consult with Group B members when putting together strategic and operational plans?

Not only is it a requirement under the statutory agreement with government, it is also good sense.

What good is a strategic plan that does not take into consideration the needs of farmers (ADF) or the realities of the marketplace (ADPF)?

The contentious Group B member here is the ADPF.

But tell me, if there is a looming issue in the marketplace around chemical residues, or milk quality, why would you exclude information from the organisations that are in the marketplace trying to supply the needs of their customers?


Were any of us aware of the increasing concern amongst international customers about NPE residues in our milk?

If we were aware, it was only as a result of our milk processors passing that information on to us.

As farmers we may well have continued producing our milk contaminated by NPEs until we suddenly realised the marketplace didn’t want our product.

What sort of disaster would that have been?

There are any number of issues that have faced our industry that we, as farmers, would never have seen coming.

Issues such as those around bobby calves, around antibiotic use, around somatic cell counts, induction etc..

It is simply good sense for Dairy Australia to consult with Group B members when putting together strategic and operational plans.

There is no basis for any conspiracy theory here.

Another criticism is that getting on to the Dairy Australia board is akin to an election in North Korea; only those selected by the board are able to be elected.

Recent events with poor corporate governance in our largest milk processor may have provided us with the best demonstration of why Dairy Australia’s rules make sense.

Rather than for dictatorial reasons, the purpose of these rules is to ensure a skills-based board is appointed, rather than one based on popularity.

All levy-payers are able to apply to sit on the Dairy Australia board.

Their applications are then reviewed by an expert panel to determine if they have the appropriate skill set.

It’s a bit like applying for a job.

Once the most appropriately qualified applicants are selected, the levy-payers are asked to approve, or not, those selected.

Should there be a levy-payer who for whatever reason did not apply for the board and they want to still be considered, there is the option of gathering 100 signatures from levy-payers and then putting themselves to the vote.

That’s a lot better than what anyone could expect when applying for any other job.

And let’s make this perfectly clear; sitting on the Dairy Australia board, or any board, is a job complete with serious legal responsibilities. 

I used to be one of those who did not understand how our industry worked.

All the arguments put to me by those who were critical of Dairy Australia, ADF, UDV and others, made sense. 

It was only when I did my own research that the lack of sense in those criticisms became clear to me. 

Does that mean I think everything is running wonderfully well? No, not necessarily.

There are always things that could be done better, could be done differently, perhaps should not be done at all.

But now my criticisms are constructive ones, based on a far better understanding of who does what and why in the dairy industry.

I challenge those of you who are busy being critical and negative to find out more about this wonderful industry and then to revisit your criticisms.

You might just find something that will benefit your own farming business on that journey.

Karrinjeet Singh-Mahil is a board member for Westvic Dairy and a former secretary of Farmer Power Australia Inc

More like this

Dairy Australia fails farmers

OPINION:

ON behalf of Farmer Power, we applaud the stand taken by Senator David Leyonhjelm in opposing the current proposal by Dairy Australia to abandon the five year poll of the dairy levy (Dairy News, November edition).

Profitability begins at home

In recent times there has been increased discussion about dairy farm profitability, by industry groups such as Dairy Australia, Australian Dairy Farmers, state farmer organisations and other industry commentators.

More from this category

Milking It...

A rod for their back

A shortage of labour is a bugbear for most farmers, but how many would think this would be a problem on a prison farm?

Help needed as farmers recover

IMAGES COMING from Queensland have been horrific. There is no other way to describe them.

The stories of local residents losing everything – from a lifetime of possessions and memories in a flood-affected house, to livestock washed away down the river – can reduce you to tears.

China and India will shape global market

 

DEVELOPMENTS OVER the last 12 months have changed Rabobank’s view on the likely role of China and India in the world marketplace through to 2014.

Long advocates of the likely self-sufficiency of these markets, Rabobank now believes that China faces a structural market deficit that will be difficult to erode in coming years.

GENOMICS HAS hit the dairy breeding industry by storm.

During the past couple of years, we have gone from almost no application of genomic/genetic marker results in breeding programs to widespread use of genomics.

THERE'S NEVER been a more important time for the Federal Government to look at the big picture when preparing policy.

A NEW report on progress of the Commonwealth water buyback for the Murray Darling indicates that the two tender rounds that were held in Queensland's Lower Balonne have been undersubscribed, leaving most of the budget of $140 million unspent.

The new milk season looms as a period of consolidation for most Australian farmers but we are starting to see a concerning divergence of fortunes between those in south eastern Australia and those in Queensland, northern NSW and Western Australia.

WORKING WITH teams both sides of the Tasman enables me to see various approaches to getting the best out of people. So I'm thinking about teamwork, in particular the merits of different leadership styles.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.\nBasic HTML code is allowed.

» Get social

When butter and chocolate collide

TWO New Zealand companies Lewis Road Creamery and Whittakers have teamed up to deliver what must be every dairy lover’s dream: chocolate butter.

» E-Newsletter

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required